ENDING: PRODUCT OWNER SABOTAGE

You send out new ceremony guidelines. "Only core team members in Agile ceremonies. Stakeholders can submit requirements through the Product Owner."

Your Scrum Master nods approvingly. The team breathes a sigh of relief. Finally, they can work.

Week 1: Meetings are manageable again. Productivity increases. This might actually work!

Week 2: You notice the Product Owner keeps saying "yes" to everything stakeholders request. The backlog is exploding again.

"Aren't you supposed to gatekeep?" you ask.

"I'm being customer-focused!" they reply cheerfully.

Week 3: The Product Owner adds Marketing's entire wishlist to the current sprint. "They said it was urgent," PO explains.

Week 4: The PO brings the CFO into sprint planning "just to observe." The CFO starts contributing requirements. The PO nods enthusiastically.

Week 5: You realize your Product Owner thinks their job is to be a middleman for stakeholder demands, not a filter. They're a requirements fire hose, not a gatekeeper.

Every time you enforce boundaries, the PO undermines them by being "collaborative" and "customer-centric."

The project fails under scope creep. In the post-mortem, the PO says: "We just needed to be more Agile."

You restricted stakeholder access. Your Product Owner became their inside agent. You can't win against a PO who doesn't understand "owner."

🔄 Try Another Path